Last week I met with an old colleague of mine who was one of the more talented people I've worked with in my career. They left Fundera as we were scaling (and went on to accomplish great things) because I was going to hire someone above them. We started working together when they were still in college and they did pretty much everything to help us get off the ground and reach product-market fit: operations, marketing, product, etc. They were a true high-potential generalist who was good at anything and everything they needed to do - likely better than even some of the best specialists in those functions. I think about them leaving as one of my biggest leadership mistakes and hardest lessons learned.
There is a lot of literature out there about how founders should always bet on their up-and-coming talent. It’s a common refrain, but we seem to regularly screw this up. We think it’s a safe move to hire the pedigreed external executive. Advisors and boards will push for it even if they don’t personally know the talent on your team. Everyone, not just founders, is predisposed to go after the “silver bullet” I’ve written about before. I think it’s important for founders to recognize this shortcoming - that our natural inclination is to wishfully believe someone out there can do magic for our company. But it's also advantageous to young and talented employees if they can recognize and expect this flaw in their founders, and I’ve been thinking about what a hungry, high-potential person can do to make it clear as day that a founder should be betting on them with more responsibility and not a trophy external hire.
This may seem like a preposterous concept. Why should it be on the employee to help a founder recognize their talent? Shouldn’t good founders always know who is good and deserves to take on more responsibility? The sooner people realize that founders are massively flawed, are largely making things up as they go along, and have a real learning curve when it comes to how to nurture and manage talent, the better - you can use that to your advantage. If you can practice a delicate mix of patience, humility, honesty, and assertiveness, you can, as a young and talented contributor, truly thrive and shoulder more responsibility than most 20-somethings can fathom. This is an extremely difficult combination of traits to express, especially when you are early in your career, think/know you’re good, and likely have an ego. It requires a great deal of maturity.
These are some things I wish I had known when I was starting my career at tumblr when it was very early stage, and things I wish I had known to communicate to high-potential people that were early in their respective careers. They may seem obvious, but they're worth reiterating. The key is you want to understand how founders really feel and think in these types of situations.
Don’t push for title. You do not need to be Chief-Anything-Officer in your early 20’s. Instead, push for responsibility. I don’t want to hear from a 20-something-year-old how they think they should be a “VP” or “Head of” or “C-something.” I will immediately go to an internal dialogue of “Screw this person, who do they think they are?” Even if you’re the messiah, most founders will think this. They want to come to this conclusion on their own. Don’t create a set of biases in the founder’s mind that you have a real sense of entitlement, even if you’re over-delivering. What I want to see is someone who is going above and beyond, delivering terrific outcomes, and yearning to do more.
Don’t imply that you are going to quit if you’re layered. Do people actually do this? All the time. Instead, produce outcomes that make you indispensable and carry yourself like you’re already in the role you want. I want approximately zero veiled threats from someone early in their career. There’s no better way to convince someone you’re not ready for a step up than to be passive-aggressive. Implying you’re going to leave if someone with 15 years more experience than you becomes your manager is just going to give a founder unnecessary anxiety. They’re going to question why you brought this up in the first place and whether they want to deal with the hassle.
Don’t constantly ask for things that don't help you perform better in your role (like more salary, equity, title and reports), but do be honest about what your aspirations are and self-aware enough to know and articulate what you need to get there. I’ve seen high-potential high-performers ask for more money at virtually every review cycle (and in between!) who earnestly believed they were advocating for themselves. Maybe they were, but they were also being annoying. That was the last thing I wanted to constantly deal with. There is a tact to this process that requires real maturity. I am not suggesting to not advocate yourself, I am saying that you need to do it in a way that conveys you are an asset instead of a diva, a leader instead of someone who doesn’t know the ropes, and exhibit some semblance of an understanding of how these decisions are made amongst leaders and founders.
These bullets may sound ridiculous or even condescending because you’re the Talent and you’ve gotta get what’s yours! And sometimes leaders do need a kick in the ass to recognize that they really are working with a superstar (I certainly needed several). But the ability to read the room and navigate it is a soft skill that will truly set you apart. In addition to being terrific at what you do, understanding weird founder psychology and being mature beyond your years can be the distinguishing factor in how much you learn, grow, and are compensated over the course of your journey at an early-stage growing startup. If you’re working with a decent founder you will notice that the people who managed to grow with the company from early on and ended up with the most responsibility and equity are almost always the ones who strategically asked for the least.
Founders of early stage startups are often deluded into believing that there is a dream partnership that will send their company into the stratosphere. It will be a silver bullet and cheat code that enables them to skip steps and grow faster than ever anticipated. This sentiment is pervasive, particularly in consumer startups. I've fallen victim to it many times. It's dangerous and seldom works. It's wishful thinking that comes at a real opportunity cost, wasting time and draining emotional energy.
At GroupMe we had a hypothesis that we'd be able to embed our group chats in third-party applications and that would help us monopolize the market and acquire new users through other established brands' properties. Since we were a "hot startup," other corporate companies wanted to work with us. We ended up spending a lot of time building custom things for AmEx and ESPN and ultimately launched embeddable group chat in two of their experimental applications. It was a ton of effort that yielded practically zero incremental user growth. I'm sure we got a couple PR pieces out of it, but relative to focusing on and improving our core product it was a total waste of time. We were less than one year old.
During our first year at Fundera we spent an inordinate amount of time chasing down a deal with Staples. They reached out as part of an RFP process to create a co-branded loan center for all of their SMB customers. They said they had millions of SMBs that were "members." It felt too good to be true. If we could work with one single partner to open up a channel directly to millions of SMBs in a trusted environment, we would overnight become the dominant player. We wasted days modeling out scenarios in spreadsheets to win the deal and put together an elaborate performance-based deal structure loaded with warrants and clauses where they could invest in the company to ultimately get to double digit ownership. We would quickly go from originating millions of dollars in loans a month to billions. This was utterly delusional. We lost the RFP process to one of our biggest competitors. I saw a press clip of their CEO and the leader from Staples in charge of the initiative ringing the NASDAQ bell together to celebrate the partnership launch. I must have rewatched it 100 times like a psychopath. I was fucking livid. The partnership produced approximately jack shit for both parties and was shut down within months.
Last week I met with an old colleague of mine who was one of the more talented people I've worked with in my career. They left Fundera as we were scaling (and went on to accomplish great things) because I was going to hire someone above them. We started working together when they were still in college and they did pretty much everything to help us get off the ground and reach product-market fit: operations, marketing, product, etc. They were a true high-potential generalist who was good at anything and everything they needed to do - likely better than even some of the best specialists in those functions. I think about them leaving as one of my biggest leadership mistakes and hardest lessons learned.
There is a lot of literature out there about how founders should always bet on their up-and-coming talent. It’s a common refrain, but we seem to regularly screw this up. We think it’s a safe move to hire the pedigreed external executive. Advisors and boards will push for it even if they don’t personally know the talent on your team. Everyone, not just founders, is predisposed to go after the “silver bullet” I’ve written about before. I think it’s important for founders to recognize this shortcoming - that our natural inclination is to wishfully believe someone out there can do magic for our company. But it's also advantageous to young and talented employees if they can recognize and expect this flaw in their founders, and I’ve been thinking about what a hungry, high-potential person can do to make it clear as day that a founder should be betting on them with more responsibility and not a trophy external hire.
This may seem like a preposterous concept. Why should it be on the employee to help a founder recognize their talent? Shouldn’t good founders always know who is good and deserves to take on more responsibility? The sooner people realize that founders are massively flawed, are largely making things up as they go along, and have a real learning curve when it comes to how to nurture and manage talent, the better - you can use that to your advantage. If you can practice a delicate mix of patience, humility, honesty, and assertiveness, you can, as a young and talented contributor, truly thrive and shoulder more responsibility than most 20-somethings can fathom. This is an extremely difficult combination of traits to express, especially when you are early in your career, think/know you’re good, and likely have an ego. It requires a great deal of maturity.
These are some things I wish I had known when I was starting my career at tumblr when it was very early stage, and things I wish I had known to communicate to high-potential people that were early in their respective careers. They may seem obvious, but they're worth reiterating. The key is you want to understand how founders really feel and think in these types of situations.
Don’t push for title. You do not need to be Chief-Anything-Officer in your early 20’s. Instead, push for responsibility. I don’t want to hear from a 20-something-year-old how they think they should be a “VP” or “Head of” or “C-something.” I will immediately go to an internal dialogue of “Screw this person, who do they think they are?” Even if you’re the messiah, most founders will think this. They want to come to this conclusion on their own. Don’t create a set of biases in the founder’s mind that you have a real sense of entitlement, even if you’re over-delivering. What I want to see is someone who is going above and beyond, delivering terrific outcomes, and yearning to do more.
Don’t imply that you are going to quit if you’re layered. Do people actually do this? All the time. Instead, produce outcomes that make you indispensable and carry yourself like you’re already in the role you want. I want approximately zero veiled threats from someone early in their career. There’s no better way to convince someone you’re not ready for a step up than to be passive-aggressive. Implying you’re going to leave if someone with 15 years more experience than you becomes your manager is just going to give a founder unnecessary anxiety. They’re going to question why you brought this up in the first place and whether they want to deal with the hassle.
Don’t constantly ask for things that don't help you perform better in your role (like more salary, equity, title and reports), but do be honest about what your aspirations are and self-aware enough to know and articulate what you need to get there. I’ve seen high-potential high-performers ask for more money at virtually every review cycle (and in between!) who earnestly believed they were advocating for themselves. Maybe they were, but they were also being annoying. That was the last thing I wanted to constantly deal with. There is a tact to this process that requires real maturity. I am not suggesting to not advocate yourself, I am saying that you need to do it in a way that conveys you are an asset instead of a diva, a leader instead of someone who doesn’t know the ropes, and exhibit some semblance of an understanding of how these decisions are made amongst leaders and founders.
These bullets may sound ridiculous or even condescending because you’re the Talent and you’ve gotta get what’s yours! And sometimes leaders do need a kick in the ass to recognize that they really are working with a superstar (I certainly needed several). But the ability to read the room and navigate it is a soft skill that will truly set you apart. In addition to being terrific at what you do, understanding weird founder psychology and being mature beyond your years can be the distinguishing factor in how much you learn, grow, and are compensated over the course of your journey at an early-stage growing startup. If you’re working with a decent founder you will notice that the people who managed to grow with the company from early on and ended up with the most responsibility and equity are almost always the ones who strategically asked for the least.
Founders of early stage startups are often deluded into believing that there is a dream partnership that will send their company into the stratosphere. It will be a silver bullet and cheat code that enables them to skip steps and grow faster than ever anticipated. This sentiment is pervasive, particularly in consumer startups. I've fallen victim to it many times. It's dangerous and seldom works. It's wishful thinking that comes at a real opportunity cost, wasting time and draining emotional energy.
At GroupMe we had a hypothesis that we'd be able to embed our group chats in third-party applications and that would help us monopolize the market and acquire new users through other established brands' properties. Since we were a "hot startup," other corporate companies wanted to work with us. We ended up spending a lot of time building custom things for AmEx and ESPN and ultimately launched embeddable group chat in two of their experimental applications. It was a ton of effort that yielded practically zero incremental user growth. I'm sure we got a couple PR pieces out of it, but relative to focusing on and improving our core product it was a total waste of time. We were less than one year old.
During our first year at Fundera we spent an inordinate amount of time chasing down a deal with Staples. They reached out as part of an RFP process to create a co-branded loan center for all of their SMB customers. They said they had millions of SMBs that were "members." It felt too good to be true. If we could work with one single partner to open up a channel directly to millions of SMBs in a trusted environment, we would overnight become the dominant player. We wasted days modeling out scenarios in spreadsheets to win the deal and put together an elaborate performance-based deal structure loaded with warrants and clauses where they could invest in the company to ultimately get to double digit ownership. We would quickly go from originating millions of dollars in loans a month to billions. This was utterly delusional. We lost the RFP process to one of our biggest competitors. I saw a press clip of their CEO and the leader from Staples in charge of the initiative ringing the NASDAQ bell together to celebrate the partnership launch. I must have rewatched it 100 times like a psychopath. I was fucking livid. The partnership produced approximately jack shit for both parties and was shut down within months.
Ride It to the Sky
Ride It to the Sky
"hiatus"
I've been doing research in a variety of different areas that interest me. After a personal experience with basal cell carcinoma that set me on a journey to better understand and take control of my own health, I ended up going deep on heart disease prevention. My father is a cardiologist and his mantra has always been that heart disease is entirely preventable. Nobody needs to die of it, so long as they know how not to.
Heart disease is the world's biggest health problem. It's the leading cause of death globally for both men and women.
It's not just an old-people problem. 25% of heart attacks occur in people younger than 54 years of age. That percentage continues to grow over time as the general population becomes increasingly less healthy (ie sedentary, obese, poor-diet, etc.). For all the damage heart disease inflicts on people's lives and our health systems, it receives very little attention. Take a look at how frequently population killers are covered by the media:
It's not sexy, and as a result an overwhelming majority of the population is unaware about how to avoid succumbing to it.
The thing about heart disease is that we have all the tools to make it a nonentity and remove it entirely from the Top 10 leading causes of death. Unfortunately, for a whole host of reason, our primary care physicians are neither equipped or incentivized to lead the charge on fixing the problem. More often than not the first sign that someone has heart disease is they drop dead of a heart attack. And by the time fortunate patients who don't drop dead approach their doctor about chest pain and are referred to a cardiologist, that cardiologist is going to wish you had visited them five years ago. It's a disease that slowly builds over decades, so the best way to really avoid dying from it is to start getting educated and taking action in your late 20s, 30s, and 40s.
Over the past several months I've spoken with several of the world's leading cardiologists and lipidologists to better understand the key elements of heart disease prevention. I've been compiling notes to get to the lowest common denominator of what is good enough (definitely not perfect!) and affordable so I can arm friends and family with the information and steps to put their heart health in their own hands. I've found that the steps/protocol for avoiding death by heart disease are very simple. Go visit your PCP and ask for the following:
Test 1: An expanded lipid panel, ideally from the Cleveland Heartlab (owned by Quest). Occasionaly, if you go for a physical, your doctor will do a standard lipid panel which covers basics like LDL-C and HDL. But the biomarkers that are most important are ApoB, Lp(a) (a critical one-time measure), and hsCRP. These are only measured in an expanded lipid panel which costs an incremental $20-90. Every lipidologist I've spoken with has stressed the importance of measuring and managing ApoB above all else - it's a far better predictor of cardiovascular disease than LDL-C. Every standard deviation increase of ApoB raises the risk of myocardial infarction by 38%. Yet because guidelines regularly lag science by 15-20 years, the AHA still recommends LDL-C over ApoB. Test for it regularly (ideally twice a year) and work to get it as low as possible. Many lipidologists will say to focus on this above all else.
Test 2: Lipidologists focus on understanding biomarkers and managing them as much as possible. Cardiologists care about understanding the state of disease and treating it. Every cardiologist I've spoken with recommends getting your calcium score either through a basic CT scan (which costs roughly $150 out of pocket unless your doctor is savvy enough to navigate insurance) or a CTA scan, ideally one with Cleerly imaging (these cost more - anywhere between $1-1.5k). Your calcium score will tell you how much calcified plaque you have in your arteries. This is heart disease (ie atherosclerosis). Everyone accumulates plaque as they age. You don't want any more of it. When plaque begins to form it is noncalcified "soft plaque" - this is the stuff that breaks free from your artery walls and creates a clot that leads to a heart attack or stroke. Calcium scores measure calcified or "hard" plaque, the stuff soft plaque turns into. It's a proxy for how much plaque you're accumulating. CT scans will tell you this. A CTA will measure both hard and soft plaque and the Cleerly scan will give you a 3D visualization of your arteries, tell you where the plaque exists, and how much and what kind there is. At the bare minimum get a CT scan. Depending on these diagnostic results, you'll need to repeat this test once every 1-5 years depending on the state of disease. The same way you get a colonoscopy at regular intervals to detect colon cancer and other disease, you should do this, too.
You'll likely need to demand these tests from your PCP. Physicians (and our medical system writ large) are disincentivized from helping you prevent disease. You need to be your own advocate on your health journey and know what to ask for. If they ask you why, just say you have a history of heart disease (you likely do), or just tell them that you want to know your biomarkers better and whether or not you have disease. Take the results of these tests and bring them to your PCP or a cardiologist for interpretation.
Treatment:
Between medication and knowledge about how to prevent or mitigate heart disease, we have all the requisite tools at our disposal to beat the thing. Statins or PCSK9 inhibitors help to lower ApoB concentrations and do miracles for lipid management. Some people have adverse reactions to statins, but there are substitutes for them. I'm on a statin. Pretty much everyone should be on one so long as they don't have adverse side effects. ACE inhibitors will help to manage blood pressure if you have high blood pressure (another thing your PCP will test for). Baby aspirin will help with blood thinning and reduce blood clots. In Europe there is a polypill that combines these three drugs and has had an extremely positive impact. There are also new medications like colchicine to help manage inflammation. Ask your doctor or cardiologist about all of these and whether they're right for you.
We can't medicate heart disease out of existence yet. Behavioral changes are also required. This means regular exercise (both strength training ideally 3x per week and cardio training that helps to improve V02 max like Zone 2 training). It also means diet. Sticking to a Mediterranean diet that is light on carbs and grains is almost always the safest bet. Most every health diet is some permutation of this. Also, if you smoke, stop yesterday.
These treatments go after the core of what Jeffrey Wessler, Founder and CEO of Heartbeat Health, succinctly summarizes: "Coronary artery disease occurs when circulating fats in the blood (lipids) are pushed by a driving force (blood pressure) into a vessel wall that is vulnerable (endothelial dysfunction)." Both medication and behavioral interventions are not one-time events - they're for life. But every single lipidologist and cardiologist I've spoken with unanimously agree that for almost everyone (unless you are an edge case or severely meaningfully diseased already) this will do the trick - you can die of something else, just not heart disease.
These tests and medications have existed for a long time. They're tools that are readily available at our disposal, but you have to ask for them. They are not prescribed unless you are sick. And unfortunately, when it comes to heart disease being sick sometimes means being dead. It takes effort to prevent this. Like many things, the biggest hurdles are knowledge and willpower. My hope is that the knowledge becomes pervasive, that accessing these diagnostics and treatments becomes easy, cheap, and ubiquitous (they pretty much already are), and that people are motivated enough to be their own advocates and take their health into their own hands and make the conscious decision to not die of heart disease.
*If you do this, I'd appreciate if you'd share with me your PCP's reaction. I'd also like to understand why you wouldn't pursue this course of action. I'm jaredhecht@gmail.com.
One lesson learned from this experience and others is that partnering with someone who has an orthogonal value proposition almost always doesn't work. Just because Staples sells office supplies to companies does not mean that they will be good at helping their customers secure loans. We partnered with FTD which works with most every florist in the country. Helping florists fulfill customer orders does not mean you can help them fulfill their credit needs. The partners that ultimately worked best were the ones that offered nearly identical products (e.g. a bank that declined customers for a loan or credit card and referred them to us to meet their demand) or ones who offered an adjacent product (e.g. Nerdwallet who had an identical value proposition for consumer credit and wanted to enter SMB credit).
Another lesson that I've learned repeatedly from both building companies and helping other entrepreneurs is that there is absolutely zero substitute for developing your own audience/network/user base. If you're early, do not fall into the trap of being starry eyed by doing some BD deal with your dream partner. It likely either won't happen, or even worse, if it does happen it won't move the needle. You will waste your time and energy getting your hopes up only to have them completely crushed. That will happen enough times on your entrepreneurial journey, you don't need to self-inflict it by fantasizing about the magical partner. Would you rather focus on making your product the best it can be and honing your unique strategy within customer acquisition channels? Or do you want to endlessly compile make believe data, presentations, and impossible scenario planning for partners for whom you're an insignificant -rounding-error-fifth-tier-pet-project? Control your own destiny and don't be someone else's bitch.
It's worth understanding the incentives of these potential partners. A lot of people at these companies search for startups to partner with as part of their "innovation" efforts, but nobody really expects these things to move the needle for them in any meaningful way. There are people whose job it is to hunt down cool new companies and figure out what they're doing and how they could potentially use them to improve their business. Be wary. While they seem like the golden ticket, their incentive is to just learn as much as they can about you so they can present upwards and look good doing their job. There are plenty of horror stories about corp dev people fishing for information and then going completely radio silent, only to resurface months later announcing a competitive product or feature of their own. You are a source of free information for them that can potentially be used against you down the road. It's like a VC doing diligence on you when in reality they're trying to get information about you to decide whether or not they should invest in your competitor. A healthy dose of paranoia doesn't hurt.
There are times when chasing down partners makes sense. If your GTM motion is primarily going to be driven through channel partners, collecting logos helps. Each partnership makes the next one easier to land. Herd mentality is everywhere, and a corporate sponsor probably won't get fired if you've already partnered with other familiar companies - it's social validation. Also, most partnerships don't work, so you'll need to do a lot of them in order to see the fruits of your labor. And sometimes there are partnerships that can create a new exponential curve. We pursued one at Fundera later on once we knew what actually drove customer demand, but our counterpart wanted a board observer seat, first right of refusal on a sale, the ability to invest at our last-round price, and economics that would have made every transaction unprofitable for us. These were their sticking points which were totally irrational given that they'd be bad for any shareholder of the company, including them. That one was worth chasing down, it just didn't end well.
Early stage, don't get distracted by this fool's errand. Stay focused on how you will help customers and defining what will differentiate you. No partnership will make up for deficiencies here, and it surely will not be a substitute for doing the hard work yourself.
"hiatus"
I've been doing research in a variety of different areas that interest me. After a personal experience with basal cell carcinoma that set me on a journey to better understand and take control of my own health, I ended up going deep on heart disease prevention. My father is a cardiologist and his mantra has always been that heart disease is entirely preventable. Nobody needs to die of it, so long as they know how not to.
Heart disease is the world's biggest health problem. It's the leading cause of death globally for both men and women.
It's not just an old-people problem. 25% of heart attacks occur in people younger than 54 years of age. That percentage continues to grow over time as the general population becomes increasingly less healthy (ie sedentary, obese, poor-diet, etc.). For all the damage heart disease inflicts on people's lives and our health systems, it receives very little attention. Take a look at how frequently population killers are covered by the media:
It's not sexy, and as a result an overwhelming majority of the population is unaware about how to avoid succumbing to it.
The thing about heart disease is that we have all the tools to make it a nonentity and remove it entirely from the Top 10 leading causes of death. Unfortunately, for a whole host of reason, our primary care physicians are neither equipped or incentivized to lead the charge on fixing the problem. More often than not the first sign that someone has heart disease is they drop dead of a heart attack. And by the time fortunate patients who don't drop dead approach their doctor about chest pain and are referred to a cardiologist, that cardiologist is going to wish you had visited them five years ago. It's a disease that slowly builds over decades, so the best way to really avoid dying from it is to start getting educated and taking action in your late 20s, 30s, and 40s.
Over the past several months I've spoken with several of the world's leading cardiologists and lipidologists to better understand the key elements of heart disease prevention. I've been compiling notes to get to the lowest common denominator of what is good enough (definitely not perfect!) and affordable so I can arm friends and family with the information and steps to put their heart health in their own hands. I've found that the steps/protocol for avoiding death by heart disease are very simple. Go visit your PCP and ask for the following:
Test 1: An expanded lipid panel, ideally from the Cleveland Heartlab (owned by Quest). Occasionaly, if you go for a physical, your doctor will do a standard lipid panel which covers basics like LDL-C and HDL. But the biomarkers that are most important are ApoB, Lp(a) (a critical one-time measure), and hsCRP. These are only measured in an expanded lipid panel which costs an incremental $20-90. Every lipidologist I've spoken with has stressed the importance of measuring and managing ApoB above all else - it's a far better predictor of cardiovascular disease than LDL-C. Every standard deviation increase of ApoB raises the risk of myocardial infarction by 38%. Yet because guidelines regularly lag science by 15-20 years, the AHA still recommends LDL-C over ApoB. Test for it regularly (ideally twice a year) and work to get it as low as possible. Many lipidologists will say to focus on this above all else.
Test 2: Lipidologists focus on understanding biomarkers and managing them as much as possible. Cardiologists care about understanding the state of disease and treating it. Every cardiologist I've spoken with recommends getting your calcium score either through a basic CT scan (which costs roughly $150 out of pocket unless your doctor is savvy enough to navigate insurance) or a CTA scan, ideally one with Cleerly imaging (these cost more - anywhere between $1-1.5k). Your calcium score will tell you how much calcified plaque you have in your arteries. This is heart disease (ie atherosclerosis). Everyone accumulates plaque as they age. You don't want any more of it. When plaque begins to form it is noncalcified "soft plaque" - this is the stuff that breaks free from your artery walls and creates a clot that leads to a heart attack or stroke. Calcium scores measure calcified or "hard" plaque, the stuff soft plaque turns into. It's a proxy for how much plaque you're accumulating. CT scans will tell you this. A CTA will measure both hard and soft plaque and the Cleerly scan will give you a 3D visualization of your arteries, tell you where the plaque exists, and how much and what kind there is. At the bare minimum get a CT scan. Depending on these diagnostic results, you'll need to repeat this test once every 1-5 years depending on the state of disease. The same way you get a colonoscopy at regular intervals to detect colon cancer and other disease, you should do this, too.
You'll likely need to demand these tests from your PCP. Physicians (and our medical system writ large) are disincentivized from helping you prevent disease. You need to be your own advocate on your health journey and know what to ask for. If they ask you why, just say you have a history of heart disease (you likely do), or just tell them that you want to know your biomarkers better and whether or not you have disease. Take the results of these tests and bring them to your PCP or a cardiologist for interpretation.
Treatment:
Between medication and knowledge about how to prevent or mitigate heart disease, we have all the requisite tools at our disposal to beat the thing. Statins or PCSK9 inhibitors help to lower ApoB concentrations and do miracles for lipid management. Some people have adverse reactions to statins, but there are substitutes for them. I'm on a statin. Pretty much everyone should be on one so long as they don't have adverse side effects. ACE inhibitors will help to manage blood pressure if you have high blood pressure (another thing your PCP will test for). Baby aspirin will help with blood thinning and reduce blood clots. In Europe there is a polypill that combines these three drugs and has had an extremely positive impact. There are also new medications like colchicine to help manage inflammation. Ask your doctor or cardiologist about all of these and whether they're right for you.
We can't medicate heart disease out of existence yet. Behavioral changes are also required. This means regular exercise (both strength training ideally 3x per week and cardio training that helps to improve V02 max like Zone 2 training). It also means diet. Sticking to a Mediterranean diet that is light on carbs and grains is almost always the safest bet. Most every health diet is some permutation of this. Also, if you smoke, stop yesterday.
These treatments go after the core of what Jeffrey Wessler, Founder and CEO of Heartbeat Health, succinctly summarizes: "Coronary artery disease occurs when circulating fats in the blood (lipids) are pushed by a driving force (blood pressure) into a vessel wall that is vulnerable (endothelial dysfunction)." Both medication and behavioral interventions are not one-time events - they're for life. But every single lipidologist and cardiologist I've spoken with unanimously agree that for almost everyone (unless you are an edge case or severely meaningfully diseased already) this will do the trick - you can die of something else, just not heart disease.
These tests and medications have existed for a long time. They're tools that are readily available at our disposal, but you have to ask for them. They are not prescribed unless you are sick. And unfortunately, when it comes to heart disease being sick sometimes means being dead. It takes effort to prevent this. Like many things, the biggest hurdles are knowledge and willpower. My hope is that the knowledge becomes pervasive, that accessing these diagnostics and treatments becomes easy, cheap, and ubiquitous (they pretty much already are), and that people are motivated enough to be their own advocates and take their health into their own hands and make the conscious decision to not die of heart disease.
*If you do this, I'd appreciate if you'd share with me your PCP's reaction. I'd also like to understand why you wouldn't pursue this course of action. I'm jaredhecht@gmail.com.
One lesson learned from this experience and others is that partnering with someone who has an orthogonal value proposition almost always doesn't work. Just because Staples sells office supplies to companies does not mean that they will be good at helping their customers secure loans. We partnered with FTD which works with most every florist in the country. Helping florists fulfill customer orders does not mean you can help them fulfill their credit needs. The partners that ultimately worked best were the ones that offered nearly identical products (e.g. a bank that declined customers for a loan or credit card and referred them to us to meet their demand) or ones who offered an adjacent product (e.g. Nerdwallet who had an identical value proposition for consumer credit and wanted to enter SMB credit).
Another lesson that I've learned repeatedly from both building companies and helping other entrepreneurs is that there is absolutely zero substitute for developing your own audience/network/user base. If you're early, do not fall into the trap of being starry eyed by doing some BD deal with your dream partner. It likely either won't happen, or even worse, if it does happen it won't move the needle. You will waste your time and energy getting your hopes up only to have them completely crushed. That will happen enough times on your entrepreneurial journey, you don't need to self-inflict it by fantasizing about the magical partner. Would you rather focus on making your product the best it can be and honing your unique strategy within customer acquisition channels? Or do you want to endlessly compile make believe data, presentations, and impossible scenario planning for partners for whom you're an insignificant -rounding-error-fifth-tier-pet-project? Control your own destiny and don't be someone else's bitch.
It's worth understanding the incentives of these potential partners. A lot of people at these companies search for startups to partner with as part of their "innovation" efforts, but nobody really expects these things to move the needle for them in any meaningful way. There are people whose job it is to hunt down cool new companies and figure out what they're doing and how they could potentially use them to improve their business. Be wary. While they seem like the golden ticket, their incentive is to just learn as much as they can about you so they can present upwards and look good doing their job. There are plenty of horror stories about corp dev people fishing for information and then going completely radio silent, only to resurface months later announcing a competitive product or feature of their own. You are a source of free information for them that can potentially be used against you down the road. It's like a VC doing diligence on you when in reality they're trying to get information about you to decide whether or not they should invest in your competitor. A healthy dose of paranoia doesn't hurt.
There are times when chasing down partners makes sense. If your GTM motion is primarily going to be driven through channel partners, collecting logos helps. Each partnership makes the next one easier to land. Herd mentality is everywhere, and a corporate sponsor probably won't get fired if you've already partnered with other familiar companies - it's social validation. Also, most partnerships don't work, so you'll need to do a lot of them in order to see the fruits of your labor. And sometimes there are partnerships that can create a new exponential curve. We pursued one at Fundera later on once we knew what actually drove customer demand, but our counterpart wanted a board observer seat, first right of refusal on a sale, the ability to invest at our last-round price, and economics that would have made every transaction unprofitable for us. These were their sticking points which were totally irrational given that they'd be bad for any shareholder of the company, including them. That one was worth chasing down, it just didn't end well.
Early stage, don't get distracted by this fool's errand. Stay focused on how you will help customers and defining what will differentiate you. No partnership will make up for deficiencies here, and it surely will not be a substitute for doing the hard work yourself.